“Opening
night for earnest!”
evaluation
Each group
member will be
evaluated by the group for a total of 50 points.
Name
of
Group Member:
0-25
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Amount
of
work the member contributed
to
the project
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Quality
of
work
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Add
the
points you think the member deserves
(out of 50 possible points)
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
RUBRIC
|
150-140
points |
The
publication is well organized and is outstanding in creativity. The information is historically correct and
the members demonstrate an extension of their knowledge by being able
to critique and embellish their publication with facts that could be
historically accurate. The presentation
flows well. |
|
139-120
points |
The publication
is organized and contains creativity. The
information is historically correct and and
the members demonstrate an extension of their knowledge by being able
to critique and embellish their
publication with facts that follow history. The presentation flows well. |
|
119-90 |
The
publication is minimally organized and shows signs of creativity, but
is lacking. The information may contain
some historical inaccuracies. The members
demonstrate an understanding of their content by being able to critique
the play, but may show misunderstanding of the play.
The presentation flows well. |
|
89-50 |
The
publication is not organized
and has very little evidence of creativity. The
information contains many historical inaccuracies.
The members lack an understanding of the content and are
unable to critique the play because of this. The
presentation is haphazard. |
|
49-1 |
There
is no organization and no creativity shown in the publication. The information is completely inaccurate. Members lack a critique due to not
understanding the content that needed to be researched.
The presentation is attempted, but not successful. |
|
0 |
There
is no publication to be evaluated. |
A total of 200
points is
possible on this Webquest.