|
unacceptable
|
developing
|
accomplished
|
list of criteria
|
criteria list is confusing and disorganized
|
criteria list is partially defined but some points
are unclear
|
criteria list is well defined and fully developed
|
quality of evaluation
|
lacks specific details about the strengths and
weaknesses of the site
|
some strengths and weaknesses are included but not
enough to make a clear evaluation
|
strengths and weaknesses of the site are clearly explained
|
complete annotation
|
annotation does not include the name of the site or
the URL
|
annotation is missing either the name of the site
of the OR the URL
|
Both the name of the site and the URL are included
|