Cynthia Vaskis

SLM521 – Spring 2004

Hoaxes Elective

3/16/04

File: e3hoaxes.htm

 

Response to Hoaxes topic on Mon Mar 15 2004 5:41 pm

 

Hi Jona,

It was interesting to read everyone else's responses to the Hoaxes literature. I only recently got my Dell computer up on the Internet and for the last several years, since email scams have been out there, I have been using my husband's iMac. We never seemed to get much scam email. Maybe it is because we don't surf too many different sites and we don't email many people. In fact, the only chain letters I have seen have been from my step mom and an old neighbor from
Texas, which I ignore.

The idea of being on the Internet and receiving these strange messages, or urban legends, reminds me of the old times when people used to sit out on their porches and tell a “yarn” (fictitious or exaggerated story) to each other to see what the reaction would be and who would believe them. Instead of having an actual physical porch, it is an ethereal mail box, and we’d all like to see what our mysterious “pen pals” want to say to us.

Unfortunately, some of these "sobby", emotional stories tug at our good nature, and “kindness” of heart, making us feel like ogres if we do not respond. Well, I’d rather be Shrek than a fool with a stolen identity.

Most of these messages appeal to our psychology in one or more of these areas:
1. Greed (“You’ve Won!” blinking message but first you need to give us all your personal information before we can tell you what you’ve won, a “gift card” to a restaurant in another state),
2. Pride (the quick online IQ test says that you’re almost a genius so send money now for your full evaluation report and diploma),
3. Envy (when you are offered a free vacation if you call now or we’ll give it to someone else and you wouldn’t want them to have what could be yours),
4. Hate (those criminals who steal little children so help us fight back and send money now),
5. Fear (of terrorists and where they may strike next), or
6.
Mankind’s better qualities such as generosity, kindness, caring for others where if you do not participate you must not truly possess these desirable traits.

If you can be overcome by one of the “evil” traits or feel it necessary to display one of the “good” traits to total strangers in order to keep your self esteem in tact, you may fall victim to identity theft, credit card fraud or have strangers show up on your doorstep when you are not home (if you’ve given them your phone number and address).

I also tried a site that claims to know your heritage and please send money for a full report on your ancestry which appeals to “family pride”.

I was glad to know that there are sites where you can "check things out" to see if the messages you have gotten are truthful. The CDC (Center for Disease and Control and Prevention) was useful to see if any human virus, alledged food supply tampering as noted by the FDA (Federal Drug Administration), or infectious disease threats are real. The DOE (Department of Energy's) CIAC Hoax buster site was good to find out if the latest rumors about computer viruses were true and whether chain letters were real situations.

The urban legends site was fun to see what stories have been going around for years. I actually heard the one about an older woman blowing up her dog in the microwave (trying to dry it off) when it first came out in Silicon Valley (where I worked then) in the late 1970's except I heard that the woman died of a heart attack when she realized what she had done.

Also, I looked at Coca-Cola's web site and the rumor about something being dissolved if you leave it soaking over night in a glass of coke was never openly denied by the company. What they said was that the acid in coca-cola was a lot less strong than the acid in your stomach (which is true) and that no one holds the drink in their mouth long enough to do any damage and the saliva dilutes it as well. My son has soaked a penny in it overnight and it did not look that much cleaner in the morning.

I think the best thing to do if you suspect that something is not true is to not take any action in that direction like sign up for something (giving out personal information). Then go check it out at one of the related sites.

The hoax buster sites warned to look for certain things in a hoax such as technical sounding information and/or them claiming credibility by association with some reputable company or person. It also warned against messages that want you to let all your friends know about that message either so that you can keep them just as informed as you. The hoax may come with a threat that if you don't pass it on then something bad will befall you.

The urban rumors appear to be so plausible and presented in a story telling manner with some punch line at the end that even if you don't believe it, you get a good laugh out of it. So people sometimes pass the story along because they consider it a good joke to tell their friends and keep the laughs coming.

The more serious rumors that can affect people's lives or companies really should be checked out and stopped or reported to be posted on the hoax busting web sites. My motto is to not believe what I see on the web in the form of pop-up messages or email I didn't ask for or sign up for. It is better to not take any action on unsolicited email or messages. Don't get involved unless you initiated the communication via email or internet inquires. Unfortunately, there may be valid groups out there who really do need help but if they are real then there should be more than one way to substantiate their claim for needing finances or support. There should be an address, company name, persons you can call or email associated with the plea for help.

Well, I may seem like an uninvolved citizen as far as helping others but my husband has given me a way out when I get those telephone calls asking for financial support. I just say that we only give to our church right now (which we do) and then they usually hang up.

I enjoyed the Snopes.com site looking for all types of urban legends where everything was well organized into topics.

I hope I never have to suffer the consequences of a hoax but I guess I can protect myself by not getting involved. Just call me an Internet hermit when it comes to unsolicited mail.

Cindy Vaskis 3/15/04

 

Reply to Charles on Tue Mar 16 2004 2:06 am

 

Hi Charles,

I liked the comment you made about the content of the hoax emails. My husband has an iMac and I usually look on that account for any email. I only recently got my own computer (a Dell) up on the net and haven't had any strange emails there yet. On the iMac account recently we've been getting a slew of "unmentionable" (or pornographic topics) emails and neither my husband nor I have ever visited any web site like that. It is embarrassing to check out what the message is about and before you can delete it, there's the yucky content in your email window.

My husband signed up for the telephone lines list of people who do not want telemarketers calling at dinner time hours but how do you sign up to be taken off the scam lists? I am not sure how to make them stop sending this kind of stuff. If you have any suggestions, or if anyone else reading this message does, please let me know in a reply here.

I enjoyed reading the urban legends hoaxes. In particular, there was one about Bill Gates being the Anti christ. My husband is an avid iMac (Apple Computer) fan and detests Microsoft's control over the PC market. He thought that hoax was great. I thought that anyone can make something out of nothing if they try really hard. It used to be people thought Henry Kissinger was the AntiChrist and then some even said Ronald Reagan was but look at his unfortunate condition now (hardly able to function let alone lead a world rebellion against believers). I think people who believe these hoaxes must not be too informed in general about the "evils" of society. Well, it was enlightening to find out that there are places to go check out these falsehoods.

One site I think I will revisit more is the CDC Department of Health's National Immunization Program (NIP) because they have a list of disease descriptions and the current
US condition of how serious they are at the moment (http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/surv-manual/default.htm). The more likely problem that my family may encounter is the flu since my kids attend school and bring stuff home with them. The site lets you know how many reported cases are in which areas.

Well, this assignment has been informative and fun. Hope to find out more interesting things as this class progresses.

Cindy Vaskis

 

Reply to Billy on Mon Mar 15 2004 8:41 pm

 

Hello Billy,

I enjoyed reading your Hoaxes evaluation. I have not received any hoaxes yet on my two new email accounts but my husband has gotten plenty on his email account that we've had for years. I think as you interact with people on the net and your email address goes out, somehow the email scammers are able to intercept those addresses. Maybe the people emailing you have your address on a distribution list and they forget to take you off when they write to some advertisement. Then the advertisement sees you on the distribution list and adds your email to their sending list.

I guess the Web is really a tangled web that we weave by all of our email sending and receiving. The government sites seem to be fairly thorough in catching the latest hoaxes and displaying them for all to be aware.

I saw an interesting story about a three headed frog on the TV evening news about a week ago and they showed the frog who seemed to be perfectly happy with three heads. I can see how someone seeing something strange like that could pass that information along and it soon becomes an urban legend by changing a few things.

I guess my motto is "Don't know 'em, don't open 'em." meaning if I don't know who sent me the email, then I just get rid of it.

Well, happy emailing to you,
Cindy Vaskis

 

Second Response to Hoaxes Topic on Tue Mar 16, 2004 4:22 am

 

Hi Jona,

I was just reading an article from Dredged Report dated
02/01/99 3:11 UTC by a Dr. Geoffrey Limache and Dr. Leroy Taho claimed that the web sites

http://urbanlegends.tqn.com/
http://www.scambusters.org/legends.html
http://www.snopes.com/

are controlled by the government to deceive the public. They state that the only way they could find out who was behind this was to access a "freely-available but relatively-unknown" database of all the Internet domain names and respective owners. The entry for http://www.urbanlegends.com is registered to the United States Central Intelligence Agency and a retired military officer and employee of the CIA runs it. I am including the article's address if you'd like to see it. (http://www.urbanlegends.com/people/dredged.html) This whole article claims that the government lists real situations as hoaxes in order to avoid embarrassing or incriminating situations for the government. So the article is saying the government is telling the public that real events are hoaxes and this guy is saying that the web sites themselves are hoaxes.

My opinion is that these authors of the dredge report article may be a hoax about a hoax since they say at the end "PLEASE SEND THIS MESSAGE TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!!". Who can you believe these days?

Talk to you later,
Cindy Vaskis 3/16/04