Developing and Applying a Rubric to Use as an Assessment Tool
Objective:
Students will be able to use internet resources provided to learn about
the use of a rubric as assessment.
Objective: Students will be
able to develop a format for presenting a clear and well-organized rubric.
Objective: Students will use the rubric created to
evaluate a website they choose.
Introduction:
We
are asked to create rubrics for a variety of reasons in our classroom
instruction. Rubrics can be used
to assess almost anything, from student writing, to a science project, to
classroom behavior. It is one of the best tools for student assessment, because
it provides a way for the student to know what is expected of them, and it also
provides a quick, easy, and fair way for a teacher to evaluate student
assignments, projects, behavior, etc. Some teachers may not be aware of some of
the online resources available to them in creating a rubric.
Activity:
Making Technology Assessment Work
for Schools - http://www.fno.org/feb98/cov98feb.html
Rubi-Star -
http://rubistar.4teachers.org/
Kathy
Schrock’s Guide -
http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/assess.html
The Staff Room -
http://www.odyssey.on.ca/~elaine.coxon/rubrics.htm
Teacher Rubric-Makers
- http://www.teach-nology.com/web_tools/rubrics/
Evaluation Rubrics for
Web Sites - http://www.siec.k12.in.us/~west/online/eval.htm
Assignment:
The resources
listed below are there to guide you in your search for a website on the topic
you choose.
Rubric:
|
|
Level
One (Beginning) |
Level
Two (Developing) |
Level
Three (Advanced) |
|
Rubric |
Doesn’t
show knowledge of format for rubric. Disorganized. Poorly
written assessment criteria. |
Shows
some knowledge of format for rubric. Fairly
organized. Assessment
criteria is stated vaguely. |
Shows
skillful knowledge of format for rubric. Well-organized.
Clearly stated assessment criteria. |
|
Rubric Scoring
of Web Site |
Evaluation
is unclear. No
score is given. |
Evaluation
does not show much thought. Score
is not given for all categories. |
Thoughtful
and meaningful evaluation. Score
for each category is given clearly. |
|
Explanation of
Evaluation |
No
explanation is given. No
defense of rubric score included. |
Fairly
well-written explanation given. Some
defense is given for the website’s rubric score. |
Well-written
and developed explanation. Good
defense is given for the website’s rubric score. |