Webpage Evaluation for Conducting Formal Research:

How to Attain the Highest Quality Information on the Internet

 

Websites such as Wikipedia are wonderful tools when we have a sudden curiosity and desire a quick answer. But when we need to conduct more formalized academic research, we need to be able to count on our sources. We cannot trust just any Joe Schmo who happens to have created or contributed to a website. Below are some guiding questions to ask yourself as you search the web for valuable research material. Perhaps if you were an advanced scholar in your subject area, you could, off the top of your head, evaluate whether Joe Schmo’s slightly “sketchy” website actually has anything intelligent to offer to the world. But you are not an advanced scholar. Thus, it is important for you to use a systematic method of evaluating the websites you encounter. These guidelines are universal and can certainly be put to use for other subject areas outside of English.

 

GUIDING QUESTIONS

Web Page #1

URL: _______________________________

 

Web Page #2

URL: ________________________________

GENERAL PROFESSIONALISM

 

 

What is the title of the webpage?

 

 

§  Does the title sound professional in nature?

   Yes

   No

   Yes

   No

In general, is the layout pleasing to the eye?

   Yes

   No

   Yes

   No

§  What elements are well placed or organized?

 

 

 

§  What elements are overly distracting, if any?

 

 

 

Is the page easy to navigate?

   Yes

   No

   Yes

   No

§  Does it have a table of contents or a menu bar with links?

   Table of Contents

   Menu Bar

   Table of Contents

   Menu Bar

Does the website document its sources?

   Yes

   No

   Yes

   No

§  If so, to what types of source material does the website refer?

 

 

§  Do the website’s sources include reliable published and/or peer reviewed materials?

   Yes

   No

Example: ____________________________

   Yes

   No

Example: ____________________________

Does the website provide other suggested site links?

   Yes

   No

   Yes

   No

§  Do the links still work?

   Yes

   No

   Yes

   No

§  Do the sites to which it links seem to have potential/be of valuable quality?

   Yes

   No

Example: ____________________________

   Yes

   No

Example: ____________________________

AUTHORSHIP

 

 

Is the website published by a group or organization – or – is it someone’s personal page?

(Look first at the page’s headings and any copyright information that may be contained at the bottom of the page.)

   Group/Organization   

   Personal   

    Unclear

   Group/Organization   

   Personal   

   Unclear

Not obvious? Check for clues.

 

 

§  Does the URL end in “.org,” “.net,” “edu,” or “.gov”? If so you should be dealing with an organization’s web page.

   Yes

   No

   Yes

   No

§  Does the URL end in “.com”? If so you are either dealing with a commercial organization’s site or someone’s personal website.

   Yes

   No

   Yes

   No

o   Does the website contain a personal name as a part of the URL following a tilde (~) or a percent sign (%)? If so, it is a personal website even if it is posted on a commercial website server. In all likelihood, it should be rejected.

   Yes

   No

   Yes

   No

Select either the Group/Organization or Personal Website track, based on you findings above.

 

 

§  Group/Organization Website

 

 

o   What is the name of the group/organization?

 

 

o   Is the group or organization legitimate?

   Yes

   No

   Unclear

   Yes

   No

   Unclear

o   Never heard of the group/organization? Conduct a quick Google search of the group name. List any websites that make mention of the group. Reject any websites for which the group seems fishy and cannot be verified. Websites of Educational or Governmental agencies tend to be safe reliable bets.

 

 

o   Does it make logical sense that this particular organization would be posting information about this particular topic?

   Yes

   No

 

   Yes

   No

 

o   Does the publishing organization correspond to the name of the site?

   Yes

   No

 

   Yes

   No

 

§  Personal Website

 

 

o   Is a personal page even an appropriate source given the nature of the task/project?

   Yes

   No

Why/Why Not? _______________________

   Yes

   No

Why/Why Not? _______________________

 

o   Can you locate information about the author of this website? If the answer is no, you should reject the website.

 

   Yes

   No

 

   Yes

   No

 

§  If the answer is yes, what is the author’s name?

 

 

§  What are the author’s qualifications and credentials?

 

 

·         Can his/her credentials be verified? Try doing a quick Google search of the person if need be.

   Yes

   No

   Yes

   No

TIMELINESS

 

 

§  What is the date when the website was last updated?

 

 

o   Given the topic/assignment, is it essential that you have the most current information possible?

   Yes

   No

 

   Yes

   No

 

o   Is the webpage outdated? If the web page seems to have been utterly abandoned, nix it from your list of sources, regardless of whether or not you need the most up-to-date information.

   Yes

   No

 

   Yes

   No

 

§  Does it seem like the website is at least a semi-permanent fixture on the web?

   Yes

   No

 

   Yes

   No

 

o   Does the web page showcase a range of years for which there has been a copyright on the material? If so, list the range here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*EXAMPLES* Webpage Evaluation for Conducting Formal Research:

How to Attain the Highest Quality Information on the Internet *EXAMPLES*

 

Websites such as Wikipedia are wonderful tools when we have a sudden curiosity and desire a quick answer. But when we need to conduct more formalized academic research, we need to be able to count on our sources. We cannot trust just any Joe Schmo who happens to have created or contributed to a website. Below are some guiding questions to ask yourself as you search the web for valuable research material. Perhaps if you were an advanced scholar in your subject area, you could, off the top of your head, evaluate whether Joe Schmo’s slightly “sketchy” website actually has anything intelligent to offer to the world. But you are not an advanced scholar. Thus, it is important for you to use a systematic method of evaluating the websites you encounter. These guidelines are universal and can certainly be put to use for other subject areas outside of English.

 

GUIDING QUESTIONS

Web Page #1

URL: http://www.poets.org/poet.php/prmPID/155

 

Web Page #2

URL: http://www.cswnet.com/~erin/emily.htm

GENERAL PROFESSIONALISM

 

 

What is the title of the webpage?

“Emily Dickinson”

“Erin’s Emily Dickinson Page” “Emily Dickinson”

§  Does the title sound professional in nature?

x   Yes

   No

   Yes

x   No

In general, is the layout  pleasing to the eye?

x   Yes

   No

   Yes

x   No

§  What elements are well placed or organized?

 

List of poems with links on right side,

Related links on left side

N/A

§  What elements are overly distracting, if any?

 

Links are not quite to the point of being overwhelming

Extremely plain, lack of proximity between objects

Is the page easy to navigate?

x   Yes

   No

x   Yes

   No

§  Does it have a table of contents or a menu bar with links?

   Table of Contents

x   Menu Bar (more than 1)

x   Table of Contents

   Menu Bar

Does the website document its sources?

x   Yes, though not clearly

   No

   Yes

x   No

§  If so, to what types of source material does the website refer?

Collections of Emily Dickinson’s poetry

 

§  Do the website’s sources include reliable published and/or peer reviewed materials?

x   Yes

   No

Example: The Manuscript Books of Emily Dickinson (Belknap Press, 1981)

   Yes

x   No

Example: ____________________________

Does the website provide other suggested site links?

x   Yes

   No

x   Yes

   No

§  Do the links still work?

x   Yes

   No

   Yes

x   No

§  Do the sites to which it links seem to have potential/be of valuable quality?

x   Yes

   No

Example: Website of Pulitzer Prize Winning Poet, “Today in Literature”

x   Yes (some, if you can find them)

   No

Example: ____________________________

AUTHORSHIP

 

 

Is the website published by a group or organization – or – is it someone’s personal page?

(Look first at the page’s headings and any copyright information that may be contained at the bottom of the page.)

x   Group/Organization   

   Personal   

    Unclear

   Group/Organization   

x   Personal   

   Unclear

Not obvious? Check for clues.

 

 

§  Does the URL end in “.org,” “.net,” “edu,” or “.gov”? If so you should be dealing with an organization’s web page.

x   Yes, “.org”

   No

   Yes

x   No

§  Does the URL end in “.com”? If so you are either dealing with a commercial organization’s site or someone’s personal website.

   Yes

x   No

x   Yes

   No

o   Does the website contain a personal name as a part of the URL following a tilde (~) or a percent sign (%)? If so, it is a personal website even if it is posted on a commercial website server. In all likelihood, it should be rejected.

   Yes

   No

x   Yes

   No

Select either the Group/Organization or Personal Website track, based on you findings above.

 

 

§  Group/Organization Website

 

 

o   What is the name of the group/organization?

The Academy of American Poets

 

o   Is the group or organization legitimate?

x   Yes

   No

   Unclear

   Yes

   No

   Unclear

o   Never heard of the group/organization? Conduct a quick Google search of the group name. List any websites that make mention of the group. Reject any websites for which the group seems fishy and cannot be verified. Websites of Educational or Governmental agencies tend to be safe reliable bets.

Wikipedia

Flickr

Poetry.org

Poets.com

 

o   Does it make logical sense that this particular organization would be posting information about this particular topic?

x   Yes

   No

 

   Yes

   No

 

o   Does the publishing organization correspond to the name of the site?

x   Yes, somewhat

   No

 

   Yes

   No

 

§  Personal Website

 

 

o   Is a personal page even an appropriate source given the nature of the task/project?

   Yes

   No

Why/Why Not? _______________________

x   Yes

   No

Why/Why Not? Fairly informal author presentation

 

o   Can you locate information about the author of this website? If the answer is no, you should reject the website.

 

   Yes

   No

 

x   Yes

   No

 

§  If the answer is yes, what is the author’s name?

 

Erin

erin@cswnet.com

§  What are the author’s qualifications and credentials?

 

None given

·         Can his/her credentials be verified? Try doing a quick Google search of the person if need be.

   Yes

   No

   Yes

x   No

TIMELINESS

 

 

§  What is the date when the website was last updated?

2009

Unknown

o   Given the topic/assignment, is it essential that you have the most current information possible?

   Yes

x   No

 

   Yes

x   No

 

o   Is the webpage outdated? If the web page seems to have been utterly abandoned, nix it from your list of sources, regardless of whether or not you need the most up-to-date information.

   Yes

x   No

 

x   Yes

   No

 

§  Does it seem like the website is at least a semi-permanent fixture on the web?

x   Yes

   No

 

x   Yes

   No

 

o   Does the web page showcase a range of years for which there has been a copyright on the material? If so, list the range here.

1997-2009 (12 years!)

Been around for years but not updated,

No dates provided