Search Engines

 

My Picks

Emily C. Moser

February 2004

 

This assignment was exploring new ground for me.  I was aware of the more visible search engines like Yahoo and MSN, etc.  But, I was not aware that I could really refine my search for specific info by implementing more specific ones.  I approached each category with a certain question or topic in mind and then searched to find out which search engine was easy to use and what kind of results I got.  I created this list for personal interest and use.  The two choices listed are not necessarily in order of preference.

 

General Searches

 

1.  Yahoo  http://www.yahoo.com

2.  Google  http://www.google.com

 

These are the search engines I was already most familiar with and, after exploring others, these are still the best for most basic searches.  They are both very easy to use, have consistent results, and rely on popular use.  Not a bad criteria.

 

Shopping

 

  1. MSN  http://shopping.msn.com/
  2. Dulance  http:/www.dulance.com/

 

My goal for this search was to find new lamp shades for some old table lamps I wanted to update.  MSN provided very good basic results from large, well known stores.  It was easy to use and navigate, but I was getting lamps, and could not refine my search for just shades.  I tried various other shopping search engines, and liked dulance.  This engine gave a wide variety of results from large stores to small boutiques which lent greater variety and depth to the search.  It allowed me to search under 4 major search engines and provided connections directly to specific stores.   

Travel

1.  Whats On When  http://www.whatsonwhen.com

2.  Trip Advisor  http://www.tripadvisor.com

 

My husband is Russian, so I wanted to research trips there and any related information.  While we usually use Yahoo to get travel rates and times and buy tickets, I wanted to see what kinds of results I got from the other engines.  The first one was a lot of fun.  It was easy to use, and provided useful info for festivals there (and around the world).  It rated and annotated events.  The second engine was useful for more basic, commercial and touristy info for more common vacations.  It had good articles from top travel magazines and reviewers.  I would use both sites as supplemental sources of info.

 

News

1.  Christian Science Monitor  http//www.csmonitor.com/

2. Headline Spot  http://www.headlinespot.com/

While I usually trust CNN and BBC on television for my news, I decided to see if I could find more arts news.  While I am usually wary of a news source associated with any religion, a respected friend suggested this site.  I thoroughly enjoyed its literature info and reviews as well as its learning stories which provided pertinent and interesting stories from students and teachers around the globe.  The second engine allowed me to search by subject and also to refine the search specifically to arts.  Other engines did not distinguish between arts and entertainment.  It accessed a good selection of interesting and informative articles from around the world.

 

 


 Medical

1.Med Hunt

2. AmeriStat
http://www.ameristat.org/
 

It was difficult to find results that were easy to understand with basic information.  Because I hope to be a mother in the future, I chose to research pregnancy.  While the first engine was very authoritative in that it rated its results by a medical honor code, the articles were more professionally oriented.  AmeriStat is an engine that concerns American population and demographics.  While it was not specifically medical, it had much more accessible and helpful information that could even be used in or for the classroom.