Zoloft- A Bad Research Site |
| http://www.zoloft-side-effects-lawyer.com/ |
URL: |
| Prior to opening a page, you can save time by determining if a specific search result will be useful in your research or not. To do so examine the URL of the page for the criteria below. |
| Is the publisher of the page a reliable source? | Name of publisher: No publisher name given | |
| Does the author provide credentials? | Credentials: Author not present | |
| Looking at the domain, is the publishing entity a reliable source? (.gov, .edu) | Type of domain: .com | |
| Is this page a personal page? | Author: Author not given |
Source: |
| Before selecting a site, it is important to analyze where the page came from and who is the author that created the page. Answering the following questions will help you to decide if the page you are looking is one that should be trusted for use in research. |
| Is there a clear source claiming responsibility for this page? | Name: Baum, Hedlund, Aristei, Guilford & Schiavo Law Firm | |
| Does the author provide credentials? | Credentials: No Credentials given | |
| Is there a way to contact the author? | Contact information: Provided is a mailing address for the firm |
Accuracy: |
| Accuracy of information on a web page is critical to be considered a reputable source. Errors in typing and spelling can alter the meaning of different words easily and therefore are absent in good web pages. Since there is no governing body that looks at web pages. before they are posted, verifying the legitimacy of all resources sited on the page will be a key factor in determining the value of a page as a resource. |
| Are there grammatical, spelling, or typing errors? | Example: No mistakes present | |
| Are sources of factual information present on the site | Sources: The sources provided appear to be sites that are created by non-credentialed people | |
| Are there links to additional sites or references? | Examples: There are additional links and references | |
| Are references reputable and scholarly | Reference: The sites are not reputable or scholarly |
Objectivity: |
| Determining whether or not a page present the information with prejudice is a crucial factor in determining if a site is a good resource or not. Since anyone can post a web page, the views expressed may not be neutral. Being able to distinguish between expressed personal views and neutral factual view points is a necessary skill for choosing the right sources. |
| Is there an obvious sponsor for the site? | Name: Baum, Hedlund, Aristei, Guilford & Schiavo Law Firm | |
| Is there a clear distinction between any advertising that the site information? | Types of advertising: No advertising seen | |
| Are the views expressed on the page based on factual information? | Information source: The views are not backed up with factual research | |
| Is the information provided as a public service? | Reason for information: The information provided is from a law office that handles pharmaceutical suites and therefore can not count as a public service announcement. |
Updates: |
| In many instances, information on the Internet can be outdated, especially when the information is discussing current issues in medical and scientific research or political events. Determining the age of the information and whether or not the page is update is important for choosing the right resource. |
| Are there dates present to help determine when the page was written and last updated? | Dates: There is not update or written day dates present | |
| Aside from a date, is there any other indication the page kept up to date? | Indications: There is not indication that the page is kept current | |
| Are links on the page still active and accurate? | Examples: The links on the page are all active | |
| Are any graphs or charts present dated as to when the data was gathered? | Data Dates: THere are no graphs or charts present |
Coverage: |
| Determining whether or not the information presented on a page is complete is especially important for research needs. Since for some research sources may require older, out of date information, being able to tell if the work presented on a page is complete is essential to be able to use as a resource. |
| Are there any indications that the page is still under construction? | Indications: The page appears to be complete | |
| If the site is using a print resources, is there an indication that it is available in entirety on the web? | Print Availability: There was no print source used | |
| Does it appear that there has been an effort to use sources that are current? | Currency: There are no sources to be kept present |