Kathleen Brunnett
SLM 521
July 6, 2003
Clifford Stoll’s book clearly
admonishes aspects of computers and Internet use. His main focus is the
negative impact these technologies are having on society. I found some of his
comments valid, where others seem outdated. Since his book Silicon Snake Oil
is approximately seven years old, I
am curious if any of his opinions have
changed since then. As a side note, his
book is available used on Amazon.com for $.38.
Could this be an indication that others feel his views are antiquated? Here
are some of my comments to Mr. Stoll’s opinions.
Mr. Stoll: “Few aspects of daily
life require computers. They’re irrelevant to cooking, driving, visiting,
negotiating, eating, hiking, dancing, speaking, or gossiping.” - While I agree that computers do not
directly impact these activities, they can certainly indirectly influence them.
For example, I can’t dance with a computer, but using the Internet I can find a
site that lists the moves to a new dance or locate where local dance lessons
are being offered. Email has made it easier and more economical to speak or
gossip with friends and family who live far away. Many businesses and
educational institutions rely on computers as part of daily routines to fulfill
job responsibilities or teaching methods.
Mr. Stoll: "Information
available over the Internet is often stale, incomplete, misleading, unreviewed,
or simply wrong." – I can’t fault the author for driving home this point.
Many people, especially students, fall into the trap of thinking everything
posted on the Internet is true and valid. Our school librarian teaches a
mini-lesson that proves not all websites are valid and useful. There is much
misleading information on the Internet, such as hoaxes or bias writings.
However, one cannot deny the fact that the Internet will provide more current
information and more variety on topics than an older edition print resource.
One needs to be mindful of how to search for valid information and cross-reference
the material found with other websites or different types of sources.
Mr. Stoll: “Simply by turning to
a computer when confronted with a problem, you limit your ability to recognize
other solutions – I agree with Mr. Stoll’s statement. I find many of my students
ignore other resources because they feel the Internet is the “mother load” of
information. While the Internet does provide a wealth of knowledge, it is
proper to seek other resources as well. For example, interviewing a person who
experienced the Great Depression may glean more personal and emotional information
than reading information from a website. For most of my assignments, I limit
the amount of Internet sources my students can utilize. I even found myself
craving other outlets of information besides my computer for this class.
Mr. Stoll: “E-mail is clumsy,
inefficient, and impersonal” – What did we ever do without email! I couldn’t
disagree with this statement more. Email has streamlined the way our society
communicates. It is easy to contact many people at once with email distribution
lists and with the help of spell and grammar check, the “clumsy” part of
emailing is out of the equation. While icons and appropriate lingo help
personalize the email messages, I sometimes find myself “reading into” the tone
of the sender based on word choice. This has gotten me into trouble in the
past.
Mr. Stoll: Internet is “a poor place for commerce” –
This is definitely one comment I would love for the author to revisit today. The Internet has made shopping easier for
millions of people. From comparison-shopping, to locating hard to find items,
to bidding on a dream item, the Internet is a grand place for commerce. I buy
books for discounted prices online as well as shop from catalogs online.
Granted there have been cases of stolen credit card numbers from hackers and
thieves, but overall the Internet is a safe place to browse and shop.