Bob Whalen slm521mc – Filtering Elective

Pros, Cons, and Filtering Concerns

PROS

• Adults can restrict/limit what is available to their children on the Internet depending on the age of the child.
• Some filtering programs align with Web site names and inappropriate names. Other filtering programs screen words that contain obscene or pornographic material contained in the site. Filtering appeals to many because it supposedly allows peace of mind for adults by creating a controlled environment for kids.
• Contouring sites allow links to other sites, but access is limited to approved sites. Again this allows some Internet freedom, but still provides a protective environment.

• PICS (Platform for Internet Content Selection) is working on a content rating system by the originators of the website to fine tune filtering.

CONS

• Filtering of programs and software limit certain kinds of adult material on the Internet.

• Filters will have mistakes.
• Filters block freedom of speech. First amendment rights are being challenged under the Children’s Protection Act, which requires blocking software on public libraries for all patrons of all ages.
• There is concern about the subjects that filters block out, which can amount to censorship. Censorship by the government in a free society is very questionable. Some sites are deliberately blocked, which denies access to information for all.
• Filtering programs can be very expensive for school systems as well as libraries.

CONCERNS

• One needs to maintain a balance between freedom and control depending on the age and maturity of the user. You need a balance protecting the child and the rights of the parents. You want to maintain a balance between undesirable material and freedom to take on responsibility and allow healthy curiosity.
• The best way to protect child safety is to supervise children when they are online. No system can be fully “kid-proofed”. There is no substitute for parent/teacher guidance.