Life History Patterns .

Just as in the previous classes where we discussed the of selection of a particular allele, we can also discuss how particular life history patterns could evolve. Obviously selection at this level must be a more complicated and slower process as it would involve a suite of changes to occur including physiological, morphological and developmental. We know that such selection is possible as we view the variability of life styles around us.

What life history or developmental patterns are we talking about? patterns that involve all the below:

Size: how big should an organism grow? should their growth be continuous or stop at a particular age? size?

Metamorphosis & diapause: why stages in some species?

Senescence; we all know there are limits, genetically regulated to a certain extent, of how long we can survive. Is it 'better for the species' that an individual die younger? why do individuals of some species exist for few days while others live for centuries?

Reproduction: when should an individual reproduce? One assumes the earlier an individual starts the faster the population it belongs to will grow. so should young reproduction be selected for? When if ever should a body stop reproducing?

 

Pro:

Size

Competitive edge: the larger the organism the more likely it is to out compete other of the same or of differing species

Surface area to volume ratio is better in large organisms ins terms of heat containment; we know from the class on energy class that small organism lose more heat as a results of greater surface to volume ratios.

Bigger organisms are less likely in nature [omitting humanity] to be predated upon

Larger organism generally live longer. Why this positive correlation? all the above, or is this just a converse argument - organisms that live longer [ longer senescence have a longer time to grow?]

We know that the sizes of individuals can vary from single celled creatures to those as big as a whale or redwood. What are some of the pros and cons of growing bigger?

Cons: The larger the organisms the more apparent it is and the more likely to be hit [ as with lightning for trees] or be challenged [ as with alpha males]

The individual must support its mass with more food. Not all cells are involved in obtaining food, and many must be supported by those which can. Large herbivores spend most of their time grazing for food; trees have higher light compensation levels.

The correlate between large size and longevity means that there is less flexibility for the species to genetically respond to a changing environment.

Reproductive investment is higher with larger offspring which take more food and develop more slowly.

From the previous chapter we know about the -3/2 law; the relationship between density of plants and size [ review]. If we we extend this notion, the larger the organism the less than can be supported, and if environmental changes occur which leads to fluctuations in population size, it is more likely that these species will be hardest hit. This has become a problem in terms of human induced extinctions as we tend to hit the bigger species

 

Metamorphosis & diapause:

Most of us can come up with several examples of organisms that go through one or more life stages: frogs, insects, various parasites and so on. What does a species win or lose with multiple life stages?

Pros:

The different stages may offer a species the opportunity to use different habitats when their productivity is highest. In spring aquatic conditions are good with spring overturn but generally bad in summer with nutrient depletion and low oxygen levels. Frogs can use both areas in their p rime time. Insects can feed on leaves in spring and flowers in summer.

Organisms can escape [on a large scale] when conditions go bad... larvae are stuck in one area but not moths, flies or butterflies which can readily move out.

Different stages with differing motility's allow genetic dispersal and recombination. Larval plankton can are formed by mass sperm/egg laying but once an adult in sessile form have limited abilities to recombine.

Cons Metamorphosis involves complex genetic/physiological changes involving complex regulatory mechanisms. Mutations or incorrect environmental signaling can mess up the stages.

Its probably expensive to produce a new body - although some of the nutrients are reabsorbed, energy investment in tissue development is required.



Diapause is the genetically determined resting stage during which development, protein synthesis is put on hold. Many examples exist in plants->seeds; fungal and bacterial spores. There are also resting periods which do not require a new structural form, as in hibernation.
Pros: The obvious, survival during bad periods. Without it the organisms would die.

As with metamorphosis, spores and seeds may be more readily dispersed than the nonresting phase allowing them to move to new habitats.

Cons: The obvious, expense. This is terms of structural costs and time not in production.


Senescence:

Degenerative changes that result in a increased expected mortality with age.

The problem here relates to the question of whether we are talking about ramets or genets. In noncloning species [ such as humans ?} the ramet is the genet, as our offspring contain only half of us genetically; both 'die' simultaneously. However with clonal plants, certain fungi, corals, where the genotype may continue on for hundreds to thousands of years as in creosote bush and other desert plants, only aging sections die off. Thus the concept of senescence is a bit more complicated.

Pro for clonals

Long life without tissue degeneration- however, probably not totally true as mutations will occur and the load will accumulate.
Con: If the environment changes and you are stuck with the original genotype established earlier, you are out of luck

Going back to non-clonal organisms, there are at least 2 hypotheses to explain the necessity of dying...

Mutation accumulation: UV, toxins, oxygen radicals, viruses etc. can and will degrade cells and cause mutations; this accumulated damage results in decreased survivorship/

Evolution of senescence: mutations that are not expressed till after reproduction escape selection as genes passed through reproduction are now part of the future. This is especially likely if the genes are pleiotropic - have more than one effect, and the earlier effect was positive.

There is increasing evidence that cell death really is programmed in at least one organism studied, every time the cell divides a portion of the CH is modified, thus limiting how more times it can divide. Please read the information give below on telomeres....

On an evolutionary level why should death be programmed?

Pro As stated with the mutation accumulation hypothesis, to reduce the genetic load in the population by cleansing out those with too heavy a load. Those with a load may be a burden for the population through reduced service, by chance they will reproduce and contribute their genes, or by denying a more adapted individual from prospering.

Older individuals, especially nonreproductive ones can no longer contribute to population growth. Not a problem in successful populations, but those on decreasing end can be a problem.

Older individuals may be laden with parasites, act as parasites sources for spread or just general problems in terms of resource use better used by younger individuals.

Con: Although an individual is well adapted or has rich experience base, it has no choice and will die, and with it that genotype or body of knowledge is now lost to the population.

Loss of invested biomass; energy used in body production and use of resources is now lost.



Reproduction:

Today we won't deal with the question of whether to be sexual or not, whether to be hermaphroditic or not... we'll reserve that for later in the week.

Our major consideration today is how many offspring to have and when to have sex, given a population is sexually oriented.

Does it make sense to have many offspring or few?

Pros for a large clutch size:

If the environment is tough on young individuals, then it makes sense to have extra.

If the environment is tough on adults that is makes sense to have them young and many at a time, given you may not have a second opportunity.

Cons: Many studies show that to many offspring leads to death of some or slower development for all if they all survive. Too much energy to support more and a greater probability that they will be sited and eaten by predators.

Maternal and paternal if both involved in young support, leads to increased decrease in adult health. The cost of additional food gathering, reproductive health costs are greater.



When to reproduce?
Pros for reproduction early in life: The earlier you start the more generations you can fit in. That is why the Chinese have outlawed early marriages.
Con: Younger, smaller reproducing adults cannot produce the quality or quantity of offspring that older, more experienced adults can.

Younger adults are more likely to physically impacted by early birthing.

Please read the short abstract below>

Fisheries in US & Canada: Is overfishing or habitat destruction the key culprit in fishery depletion along the east coast?

How big a problem?

US 40% of fish stocks are over exploited

Grand Banks/New Foundland which has been fished for 350+ years : fisheries have been closed in 7 out of 8 of cod stock areas. 40,000 fishermen forced to abandon their traditional livelihood

Catch declines in these areas: 87' 452,00 cubic tons ---> 93' 81,000 cubic tons ---> 94' 22,000 cubic tons

Why?

1. Over fishing models predicted early on that large catches would threaten populations but managers who awarded permits and regulations wanted to maintain relationship with fishermen. This resulted in 60% actual removal of adults over the 20% recommended by modelers.

2. Predation by seals which were increasing in number with protection

3. Cold seawater changes due to climatic changes whether human or naturally induced

4. Reduction in forage fish for cod.

5. Poor production of young cod to replace declining adults: research indicated that age of sexual maturity dropped in cod from 6-7 year to 2.78-5.08 years dependent on site sampled. Smaller younger fish produce less eggs ( 370 K relative 1.6 million eggs a older, larger cod can produce). The eggs themselves are smaller reducing the probability of survival, combined with less eggs results in less offspring making it to juvenile stages. Also, fewer spawning periods were noted.

From text should reflect that this is a perfect example of compensatory response: as population lost adults, younger individuals who could reproduce were selected since they are they only ones who could contribute thief genes to the next generation. This contains a genetic selection connotation - we have selected for r -types in a species which was previously more K-type. I suppose the good news was the species was "genetically plastic or variable to make this transition.


The materials below are taken from: http://www.ultranet.com/~jkimball/BiologyPages/T/Telomeres.html

* Telomere functions
Telomeres
Each eukaryotic chromosome consists of a single molecule of DNA associated with a variety of proteins.
Example: an average human chromosome contains a single molecule of DNA of about 150 million nucleotide pairs (150 x 106 bp). Stretched to its full length, this molecule would extend 5 cm. (about 2 inches). In the chromosome, this molecule is packed into a much more compact structure. The packing reaches its extreme during mitosis when this chromosome would condense to a structure some 5 µm long (a 10,000-fold reduction in length).
The DNA molecules in eukaryotic chromosomes are linear; i.e., have two ends. (This is in contrast to such bacterial chromosomes as that in E. coli that is a closed circle, i.e. has no ends.) The DNA molecule of a typical chromosome contains
* a linear array of genes (encoding proteins and RNAs) interspersed with
* much non-coding DNA.
Included in the non-coding DNA are
* long stretches that make up the centromere and
* long stretches at the ends of the chromosome, the telomeres.

Telomere functions
Telomeres are crucial to the life of the cell. They
* keep the ends of the various chromosomes in the cell from becoming entangled and sticking to each other
* they assist in the pairing of homologous chromosomes and crossing over during prophase of meiosis I.
The telomeres of humans (and mice) consist of as many as 2000 repeats of the sequence 5' TTAGGG 3'.
5'...TTAGGG TTAGGG TTAGGG TTAGGG TTAGGG TTAGGG..3'
3'...AATCCC AATCCC AATCCC AATCCC AATCCC AATCCC..5'
Replication of linear chromosomes presents a special problem.
DNA polymerase can only synthesize a new strand of DNA as it moves along the template strand in the 3' -> 5' direction. This works fine for the 3' -> 5' strand of a chromosome as the DNA polymerase can move uninterruptedly from an origin of replication until it meets another bubble of replication or the end of the chromosome. However, synthesis using the 5' -> 3' strand as the template has to be discontinuous. When the replication fork opens sufficiently, DNA polymerase can begin to synthesize a section of complementary strand - called an Okazaki fragment - working in the opposite direction. Later, DNA ligase stitches the Okazaki fragments together.

In the figure on the right, the horizontal black arrows show the direction that the replication forks are moving. Wherever the replication fork of a strand is moving towards the 3' end, the newly-synthesized DNA (red) begins as Okazaki fragments (red dashes).
This continues until close to the end of the chromosome. However, the molecular requirements of the process are such that 5' end of each newly-synthesized strand cannot be completed. Thus each of the daughter chromosomes will have a shortened telomere.
It is estimated that human telomeres lose about 100 base pairs from their telomeric DNA at each mitosis.
This represents about 16 TTAGGG repeats. At this rate, after 125 mitotic divisions, the telomeres would be completely gone.
Is this why normal somatic cells are limited in the number of mitotic divisions before they die out?

Telomeres and Cellular Aging
Telomeres are important so their steady shrinking with each mitosis might impose a finite life span on cells. This, in fact, is the case. Normal (non-cancerous) cells do not grow indefinitely when placed in culture.
See Cancer Cells in Culture for a discussion of the differences between normal and cancerous cells grown in culture.
Cells removed from a newborn infant and placed in culture will go on to divide almost 100 times. Well before the end, however, their rate of mitosis declines (to less than once every two weeks). Were my cells to be cultured (I am 67 years old), they would manage only a couple of dozen mitoses before they ceased dividing and died out.
Could shrinkage of telomeres be a clock that determines the longevity of a cell lineage?
Evidence:
Some cells are immortal.
* the cells of the germline (the germplasm)
* unicellular eukaryotes (like Paramecium)
* some cancer cells
It turns out that these cells are able to maintain the length of their telomeres. They do so with the aid of an enzyme telomerase.
Telomerase
Telomerase is an enzyme that adds telomere repeat sequences to the 5' end of DNA strands. By lengthening the strand prior to replication, cells with active telomerase are able to compensate for telomere shortening during DNA replication.
Telomerase:
* is a ribonucleoprotein
* Its single RNA molecule provides an AAUCCC (in mammals) template to guide the insertion of TTAGGG.
* Thus telomerase is a reverse transcriptase; synthesizing DNA from an RNA template.
Telomerase is generally found only in
* the cells of the germline, including embryonic stem (ES) cells
* unicellular eukaryotes
* cancer cells
However, when normal somatic cells are transformed in the laboratory with DNA expressing telomerase, they continue to divide by mitosis long after their normal life span is over. And they do so without any further shortening of their telomeres. This remarkable demonstration (reported by Bodnar et. al. in the 16 January 1998 issue of Science) provides the most compelling evidence yet that telomerase and maintenance of telomere length are the key to cell immortality