Chapter 26: Population Distribution: Urban living and sustainable cities

In class: we will review city growth, problems, then work on data for our individual cities...

In the next 30 years the world's population will grow by 2.2 billion people. Of these, 2.1 billion will be born in cities. 2.0 billion will be born in the world's poorest cities. If developing nations are well-managed, they will be engines for economic growth, national prosperity, civil harmony and global peace. If not, rapid urbaization will poison the air we breather, create life threatening water shortges, depleste valuable resouces, stangle ecomomic growth, widen income disparities and increase the spread of disease... USAID


Background reading: read on your own..
If we compare city growth in the following three countries, and compare it with Europe, we realize many of the problems are common to all, but the ability to deal with these problems differs..


Lagos, Nigeria

Lagos is the most populous city in Nigeria, the largest country in Africa. The metropolitan area, an estimated 300 square kilometers, is a group of islands endowed with creeks and a lagoon. Lagos is projected to be one of the world's five largest cities by 2005.
In an effort to reduce massive urbanization in the metropolitan area, the Federal Government is in the process of moving the capital to Abuja.
The original settlers of Lagos, or Eko as it is called by the indigenous population, were of Benin and Awori Eko heritage. The city began in the fifteenth century as a Portuguese trading post exporting ivory, peppers, and slaves. It subsequently fell into the hands of the British, who began exporting food crops after outlawing slavery in 1807. Although Nigeria gained independence in 1960, a two-and-a-half year civil war broke out in 1967.
After the war, migration to the city, coupled with huge waves of refugees and migrants from other African countries, produced a population boom that has continued to the present day.
Lagos is the commercial and industrial hub of Nigeria, with a GNP triple that of any other West African country. Lagos has greatly benefited from Nigeria's natural resources in oil, natural gas, coal, fuel wood and water. Light industry was prevalent in post-independence Nigeria and petroleum-related industry dominated in the 1970's, directly affecting the rapid growth of Lagos.
Oil production, which began in the 1950's, increased seven-fold between 1965 and 1973, while world oil prices skyrocketed. By 1978, the metropolitan area accounted for 40% of the external trade of Nigeria, containing 40% of the national skilled population. The world recession in 1981, which caused a sharp fall in oil prices, sent Lagos reeling into debt and runaway inflation that persist at present. As a result, a massive programme of infrastructure and social services expansion came to an abrupt halt.
Energy and water access, sewerage, transportation and housing have all been adversely affected by haphazard development of a geographically disjointed city. Unlike the rest of Nigeria, 90% of the population of Lagos have access to electricity, with the city consuming 45% of the energy of the country. Despite the region's endowment of water, the city suffers from an acute and worsening water supply shortage. And due to inadequate sewerage, much the city's human waste is disposed of by the drainage of rainwater through open ditches that discharge onto the tidal flats. With congested bridges, traffic congestion is a daily problem in Lagos: it takes an average of two to three hours to travel 10-20 kilometres. A high-speed, elevated metro-liner is in the planning stages.
Since 1985, state urban renewal plans have concentrated on upgrading the environment of slum communities by building roads and drainage channels and providing water supply, electricity, schools and health clinics. With cooperation from the citizens, success has been recorded in a number of pilot urban renewal schemes, which focus on building roads and drainage channels and providing water supply, electricity, schools and health clinics.


Shanghai, China
Shanghai is the most populous city in China and one of the world's major ports. It was established more than 700 years ago at the tip of the Changjiang River Delta on the East China Sea. By 1816, more than half a million people lived in Shanghai, and it became a thriving commercial centre.
The municipality of Shanghai is under the direct jurisdiction of the Central Government of the People's Republic of China. Population density in the central city is very high at 8,265 people per square kilometer.
The main causes of Shanghai's rapid population growth in the 1950's was due to natural increase and unregulated in-migration from the outskirts of the city. Factors responsible for the stabilization of population after that period include the success of the Government family planning programme, and a successful decentralization programme that developed satellite towns which absorbed much of the growing urban population.
Shanghai has a significant heavy industry sector, primarily, machinery manufacturing, textiles and steel. The city produces a large percentage of the power generation equipment and ships in China. Proximity to the cotton-growing regions of China and access to the coast for easy international transportation have contributed to the strategic importance of the city.
After the 1949 revolution, city planning in China emphasized integrated industrial centres consisting of complementary industries clustered together, with workers' housing nearby, so that employees were within walking distance of their workplace. The same design principles have been applied in Shanghai to more than 150 integrated developments built since 1949.
Almost all households have access to piped water, electricity and garbage collection. The solid waste in Shanghai, which has a high organic content, is carried to the surrounding rural areas and provinces and used as fertilizer. Non-organic waste is reused in pit filling or brick making, or it is sold to the recycling stations.
Infrastructure and environmental problems of the city are in the form of housing shortages and air and water pollution. Heavy dependence on coal as a source of fuel for both industrial energy and residential heating in Shanghai has resulted in significant air pollution. Shanghai has the highest cancer mortality rate in China. Also, a daily flow of approximately 4 million cubic meters of untreated human waste enters the Huangpu River creating a serious water pollution and supply problem.
Contrary to the master plan of 1953 which sought to increase the population of Shanghai, current policy seeks the continued success of decentralization from Shanghai to the seven satellite towns built around the city.

Tokyo, Japan
Known as Edo until 1868, Tokyo is a coastal city with an intricate history. In 1457, Edo Castle was constructed and in 1603 it became the seat of the Tokugawa Shogunate. Under the Tokugawas, the city was constructed in order to profit from the natural waterways that serve as transportation canals. By the early 1700's, the population of Tokyo was already estimated at 1.2 million, while the population of London and Paris was 650,000 and 500,000 respectively. In 1868, with the overthrow of the Tokugawas and the beginning of the Meiji era, Edo became capital of Japan under a new name, Tokyo, which means "Capital of the East".
At the beginning of the Second World War, after intensive modernization, Tokyo had a population of 7.4 million, despite the Great Earthquake of 1923. In 1950 the population was 6.9 million and doubled to 16.5 million in 1970. In 1995, the estimated population of the urban agglomeration was 26.8 million.
Tokyo has a concentration of light manufacturing but also produces goods which require a sizable workforce, such as electrical products, cameras and automobiles. Most establishments, however, are small shops with fewer than 30 workers.
Tokyo serves as a wholesaling and distribution centre for surrounding areas, and is also the chief financial centre of Japan. Tokyo houses many domestic and international corporate headquarters.
After the Second World War, Tokyo experienced a large housing demand which it could not satisfy. The 1970's and 1980's witnessed a surge in construction of multistory condominiums intended for sale. However, the prices soared making them inaccessible and unable to meet the needs of the city.
Though Tokyo, like other major cities, suffers from traffic congestion, the main congestion is on the public system during peak hours. The major method of transportation in Tokyo is the dense network of electric railways, subways, and bus lines, which keeps pollution from cars relatively low.
Water is supplied by aqueduct systems to the metropolitan area. Local waterworks and private industrial and residential systems supplement the municipal water supply. The main sources of water are the Tama and Tone-Edo rivers and three reservoirs. However, in order to meet increasing demand, additional dams have been built on nearby rivers, which is causing the eastern lowlands area to subside.
The rapid growth of the metropolitan area stressed the sewage system which in turn resulted in the decrease of water quality. However, since the 1960's, sewage systems have improved and refuse is now incinerated, recycled or reused.
Periodically, there have been proposals to relocate the nation's capital away from Tokyo in an effort to decentralize. However, to date none have come close to implementation.


UNEP Global Environment Outlook 2000 United Nations Environment Programme Next: References 

The built-up areas in Europe and Central Asia have grown dramatically over the past hundred years - currently almost three-quarters of the population in the region live in cities. Rapid city growth has had many ecological and environmental health consequences. For example, major industrial areas, originally developed in open country on the outskirts of cities, have been surrounded by residential areas, whose inhabitants often suffer from health and pollution problems. Although the patterns of city growth in Western Europe have differed from those in the East, the general direction of development and the environmental consequences have often been similar.

Some three-quarters of the region's population live in cities, and rates of urban growth have now slowed to almost zero except in Central Asia; in Eastern Europe, they are now negative
In Western Europe, the 1960s and 1970s were periods of rapid suburbanization and decline of city centres, while in Central and Eastern Europe there was massive urbanization. Suburban growth is now starting to gain momentum in parts of Central and Eastern Europe where economic transformation is enabling wealthy people and the growing middle classes to buy suburban family houses and commute to work by car. An important recent development in the eastern part of the region has been the large migration of Russian-speaking people, mainly from Armenia, Georgia and Central Asia, to cities in European Russia, which has caused additional pressure on already vulnerable social systems from the point of view of new housing, job creation and medical care (IOM 1998).
Overall, air quality in most cities has improved over the past few decades. Ozone, however, remains a major problem in some Western European cities. Transport has become the major contributor to several air pollution problems in Western Europe. Despite rigorous and effective measures to reduce car emissions, most air pollution in major cities still comes from automotive sources, and the number of cars continues to increase. At the same time, there have been some improvements in transport-related air quality; for example, atmospheric concentrations of lead are falling due to the reduction of the lead content in petrol (EEA 1997).
 
The sharp growth in the number of vehicles in the region is now the major cause of urban air pollution
In Eastern and Central Europe and Central Asia, the worst pollution in cities occurred during the 1970s and 1980s, when industrial production increased with little regard for environmental consequences. Although there were fewer cars than in the West, they were mainly domestically-produced models with high emission rates. Although emissions from stationary sources have fallen considerably since 1990, there has been some growth in urban mobility and car ownership; this is expected to accelerate in the coming decade. Emissions are likely to grow as a result, despite the introduction of cleaner cars (EEA 1998a).
In general, in practically all major cities, automotive sources are replacing stationary sources as the dominant contributor to air pollution, resulting in a reduction of winter smog but an increase of summer smog.

Problems with municipal waste have increased, with waste quantities per capita in Western Europe rising by 35 per cent since 1980. Most waste is dealt with by the cheapest available method: in OECD Europe during 1991-95, 66 per cent of municipal waste went to landfills, 18 per cent was incinerated, 9 per cent was recycled, 6 per cent was composted and 1 per cent was treated in other ways (OECD 1997). Recycling of waste in most Western European countries is increasing.
Urban wastewater treatment standards vary markedly across the region. Most of the population in northern Europe now lives in houses or flats connected to a sewer. In many cities in southern and eastern Europe, however, water receives no or only limited treatment. In most Central and Eastern European cities, wastewater is still collected together with rainwater and discharged to water bodies without treatment, causing eutrophication, especially in some urban estuaries (EEA 1998a).
About 60 per cent of large cities in Europe are overexploiting their groundwater resources, and water availability may increasingly constrain urban development in some areas. Leakages from water mains of up to 50 per cent are common (EEA 1998a). Many cities in Eastern Europe and Central Asia have for many decades suffered from poor quality drinking water due to pollution of surface and groundwater sources, obsolete water purification techniques and the poor state of water mains. These problems were aggravated after the beginning of economic transition when many local municipalities lacked funds to improve the drinking water supply. For example, in the Russian Federation, in 1995, about 22 per cent of drinking water samples did not meet chemical standards and almost 9 per cent exceeded acceptable bacteriological levels (Ministry of Nature Protection of Russian Federation 1996).
Urban noise is an important problem throughout the region. The maximum acceptable noise level is regularly exceeded in most cities. In Europe overall, about 10 million people are exposed to environmental noise levels that may cause hearing loss (OECD/ ECMT 1995).
In spite of progress in some environmental areas, the large cities of the region will continue to present major environmental challenges. Their 'ecological footprints', the ecological productive areas needed to support their populations with renewable and non-renewable resources and to absorb their emissions and wastes, are large and growing. Many city authorities are exploring ways of achieving sustainable growth in the context of Local Agenda 21 policies, which require the implementation of measures aimed at reducing use of water, energy and materials, and better planning of land use and transportation. As of 1 January 1999, 360 cities, some 334 of which are in Western Europe, have already joined the European Sustainable Cities and Towns Campaign (ESCT 1998).

Sustainability was given significant impetus as a central objective of international, regional and local policy by the Agenda 21 action plan formulated at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio. Europe has been at the forefront in implementing the action plan - notably, as a result of the European Sustainable Cities and Towns Campaign.
But policy-makers soon came to appreciate the difficulty of implementing sustainable strategies in practice - especially in cities, where they were most needed. First, the economic, environmental, social and cultural dimensions of sustainability are highly interdependent, making the impacts of policy action hard to predict and measure. Action that appears successful at the scale of the neighbourhood or district may lead to unforeseen negative consequences at the level of the city or region. Similarly, initiatives in single policy areas may produce negligible net gains unless linked to complementary schemes in other areas. Urban highways designed to relieve congestion may in the long term exacerbate it, for example, by increasing dependence on private cars.

In short, what is required is an entirely new, holistic approach. This necessitates the integration of technologies and tools which have until now been the responsibility of separate disciplines and functions. It also demands the co-ordination or amalgamation of budgets traditionally controlled at different levels of government, and by different departments within individual authorities.
Second, despite the Brundtland thesis that 'business as usual' is not sustainable either environmentally, socially or economically, many cities feared that vigorous action to protect the environment and improve quality of life would make them less attractive to investors. As the end of the 20th century approached, capital and workers were more mobile than ever, and few corporations felt strong allegiances to particular locations. With no obvious means of enforcing civic responsibility, many cities and regions simply sought competitive advantage by maintaining less rigorous regimes than their neighbours.
Enacting sustainability requires entirely new forms of urban governance, as a framework for reinvigorated stewardship of our cities. New participatory procedures are needed, to break the deadlock which so often arises between opposed interests. And to ensure that solutions truly meet the needs of all those affected by them, all stakeholder groups - not just municipal authorities, but businesses, communities and individual residents - must be actively engaged at every stage, from planning to evaluation.

 

Urban Living and sustainable Cities


Approximately 43% of the World population now lives in urban areas, with the majority of individuals in more developed
nations ( 75%) in the city relative to minority (35%) in developing nations

Worldwide 1950 --> 2000 People living in urban areas have increased 12 times over :
From 200 million to 26+ Billion

Cities themselves are getting larger: today 1/10 individuals lives in a city with 1+million people.
Megacities: house 10+ million people There are 21 in the world, 17 of these in developing nations

What this has spawned is a major increase in urban poor : 17% or 1 Billion people live in squatter settlements or shanty towns

Why this switch over to urban life?
Agriculture has become mechanized requiring less people-previous to the 50's manual labor in farming was the norm.
More jobs in the city- the possibillity though not the reality of jobs in the city beckons people.
More resources from education to health and entertainment.

Pro City life Con city life
More jobs, more housing choices Cities getting older: school, pipes bridges and structures in general falling apart
Better sanitation

Better entertainment, cultural events
Rich tax payer have migrated out leaving poor unable to pay much tax to support city. With less tax base cities find it hard to maintain or build new structures or offer services
Better medical care Higher traffic, violence, drugs

History of cities

With their industries, traffic jams and sleek buildings, cities are often seen as new developments in history. In fact, the origin of cities goes back thousands of years and passes through at least three distinct phases.
The first phase began between 5 to 6 thousand years ago with settlements that grew into what we call the river valley civilizations of Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq), Egypt, India and China. Early on, the settlements depended largely on agriculture and domesticated animals. However, as the civilizations grew in size and trade routes grew in number, these settlemetns became centers for merchants, craftspeople, traders and government officials. The division between "town" and "country", "urban" and "rural" had begun. A similar path was taken by later civilizations such as the Greek, Iranian, Roman and the Great Zimbabwe.
The second phase in the development of cities came much later with the industrial revolution in Europe around the middle of the 18th century. Factories needed a large labour force and a rise in commercial activity created new opportunities in cities. Looking for employment and a better life, people moved from rural areas into cities in greater numbers than ever before.
The third phase began after the Second World War. The largest and fastest growth in the world's urban population has taken place in the decades since 1950 . As the world economy became more international and grew in size, cities all over the world began to grow larger at a very fast pace. Most of this growth has been concentrated in Asia, Latin America and Africa, although some U.S. cities such as Phoenix and Los Angeles have been growing at the same pace.

 
 

Based on an input/output analysis:
44% of the world's population living in urban areas which occupy 5% of the land but
consume 75% of the resources. Enormous amounts of wastes come out of these areas in
terms 'used' air, degraded products, noise but also some positives - ideas & technology.

How to make cities better?

The 'new' concept is to make cities sustainable: true sustainablity is an impossibility - however approaches can be taken to help reduce some of the inputs and outputs. For example

1. Example use of trees:

Dirty air and water can be reduced with increasing use of trees.
Trees absorb air and filter it
By taking in solar radiation they help cool and by transpiration they increase humidity
Trees absorb sound
Trees support wildlife
Trees psychologically soften the environment

 

2. Urban gardens could produce 15% of the world's food.
3. Reduction of concrete surfaces and more streams/creeks to funnel off water


Where attempts have not been made to moderate these inputs we see:

1. Air pollution 1 out of 5 city dwellers ( 1.1 Billion) worldwide are exposed to air that is harmful to their health.
Breathing on a bad air day in Mexico City is equivalent to smoking 2 packs of cigarettes a day.
It was so bad, that they now have select days when you can take your turn to drive in the city.

2. In less developed nations, 90% of all sewage is dumped directly into local waterways without treatment.

The structure of the city causes it to form its own climate pattern...

The temperature of air inside the city is higher than outside.This warm air results in a pocket which holds its pollution and causes it to recirculate. Means to reduce air temperature through restriction of concrete or shading of concrete surfaces, cutting back of tarred parking areas, increasing vegetation which blocks the sun are some ways to help cool down the cityl

Noise levels are high enough in areas of the city to cause physical or mental harm.

Some solutions are:
To require the use of less noisy machinery ( this can be done; Quiet brands do exist)
Use of noise shields along busy roads ( those concrete walls on the highway)
Use of anti-noise technology: different wavelengths cancel each other out.

Of course one of the worst insults is the continued use of cars and trucks:
In Europe cities are compact so that people live, work and play within a set area. Stores and work can be walked
to and there is mass transit and bike paths so people can get to where they need in a comfortable amount of time.
In the US, China and now even Europe, the last shift from working in the city but living in suburbia has cost these nations much.

Urban sprawl is expensive:

1. The road infrastructure is extremely costly - without massive government subsidies it could never have been completed.

Currently: Fifty-nine percent of America's urban and rural roadways are in poor, mediocre, or fair condition.
A US Department of Transportation report states that to improve the condition and performance of roads and bridges requires an average annual capital investment of $ 94 billion over a 20 period from 1998-2017, 66 percent more than the $56.5 billion capital expenditure the agency projected for 2003.

2. The cost to suburbia is also dear... suburban towns all over are trying to deal with costs of building new schools,
new water support systems, new health services, fire services etc.
If the only tax money comes from residential buildings, it costs the town more for support/education then they get
back in taxes.

 

AUTOMANIA is an American phenomenon: We have 5% of the world's population but own 35% of the world's supply of cars. Unfortunately car ownership is now increasing worldwide.

Negatives of car ownership:

1.Improvements to the transportation system can help save lives. Each year there are more than 41,000 highway fatalities. More than 5,000 pedestrians are killed in traffic crashes.

2. As we know air pollution is directly related to car and truck use. If we were to include the cost
of health problems related to this alone.

3. More land is devoted to housing cars than to people.. between garages, parking lots especially
in cities

4. $100 Billion/ year is lost due time and money lost in traffic delays

5. Costs of roads

6. Cost of fossil fuels - dependency on oil


Could we cut down on car use? yes if provided:

Ridership on public transportation is up by 21 percent over the past five years, to the highest levels in forty years.
* In the year 2000, passengers in the US took 411 million trips on our commuter railroads, an increase of 5.2 percent over 1999. In Tokyo and Europe, public transportation is a necessity.. however, demand for cars is increasing.

Solutions:

1. Bicycles from low tech self-pedal to higher tech electric scooter and leviators.

2. Mass transit: light rail was available early in the century ( trolly).. it was bought out by tire and car
manufactures to give commuters no choice but to buy cars. It now is in revival phase. Although buses cost less, people prefer light rail

3. Underground and rapid rail, regional trains, light rail and so on cost just 1/10 the price of
creating new highways or heavy rail systems.

4. There is a movement especially in rural areas for vans which pick up scheduled passengers and bring them directly to where they need to be.

Case Highlight: America's Car-Sharing Program
In the mid-1980s, Conrad Wagner invented the concept of “car-sharing” in Lucerne, Switzerland. Essentially, cars are rented out to members who pay small annual and hourly fees. The first user of the day may drive the car from home to work and park it at an agreed-upon spot, where a second user picks it up to run day-time errands, returning the vehicle at the end of the day for the commuter. Others may schedule use for more occasional outings, such as a special trip, getting groceries, or picking a friend up from the airport. The program allows city-dwellers who do not frequently need a car, or may not be able to afford a car or parking, to have the conveniences of a car, without the worries of insurance and maintenance. A Swiss study showed that members also drive 50% less than if they owned their own car, as they only drive when necessary, thereby cutting fuel-use, greenhouse gas emissions, and traffic congestion. Today, Wagner's company has a fleet of over 1,600 vehicles. As of 2002, there were over 120,000 participants of car-sharing in Europe, making it a $200 million dollar industry.
In 1999, Neil Peterson, then working for a public transportation agency, toured Europe and witnessed car-sharing first-hand. Once back in the U.S., he decided to found Flexcar in Seattle, a public-private partnership in car-sharing. The oldest and now largest of the American companies, Flexcar can be found in sixteen cities, including San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, Portland, Seattle, Denver, Chicago and Washington, DC. In May 2004, it was honored with the 2004 Sustainable Community Outstanding Leadership Award from Sustainable Seattle.

Models for better city structe include the below greenbelt plan: it permits the use of
mass transit, allows large green areas to exist.

Northern Virginia Planners Take Lessons from Stuttgart, Germany
Smart Growth and transportation planners in Virginia aspire to duplicate the successes that Stuttgart, Germany attained in planning over the last decade. In a formal region-to-region agreement signed in February 1999, the first ever international cooperative agreement between two regional governmental agencies, the Northern Virginia Regional Commission (NVRC)—made up of the five Virginia counties of suburban Washington, D.C.—agreed to share planning and environmental management practices with the Verband Region in Stuttgart, Germany.
As a part of the agreement, a delegation of Northern Virginia local government officials traveled to the Verband Region Stuttgart in Germany in July of 2000, to learn and discuss issues that local governments face in both countries. German officials presented information on projects that have made their communities more livable while Northern Virginia officials shared local efforts in economic development and the environment. NVRC's report on the exchange stated, “the delegates felt that this exchange proved to be one of the most valuable experiences of their professional and political lives.”

Lessons learned from Stuttgart include holistic watershed management, integrated land-use and regional planning, regional governance, "green" air corridors, sustainable transportation, and constructed wetlands. As a direct result of the partnership and exchange, the Virginia State Legislature passed a bill in Spring 2002 initiating a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) project for the purpose of sharing air flow mapping and health data. NVRC Executive Director G. Mark Gibb wrote: " This is just one of many useful ideas that are being discussed and implemented in Northern Virginia as a result of the partnership…Other localities are implementing rooftop gardens, car sharing, new traffic calming techniques, open space planning, and town modeling as a result of our trip and information exchange. I think it is important to know that our international partnership is paying back with both interest and dividend."

Housing Enablers: Shelter
A report released by the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) suggests that one way to improve housing problems is to depend less on the government to build and carry out housing schemes. Instead, government should become an “enabler”, helping private citizens construct and improve their own facilities. The Community Contracts System developed by the National Housing Development Authority in Sri Lanka is an example of an enlightened governmental approach to squatter settlement upgrading that not only generates improved housing and infrastructure but creates economic opportunities for the residents as well.
Through Community Contracts, residents construct their neighbourhood's physical infrastructure. They build footpaths, drains, wells, toilets and other basic necessities, transforming slums into well-maintained communities. Maintenance and repair is better and easier because the people who do the work also reap the benefits. The Habitat report concludes that the role of government must change in the urban environment if the needs of the population, especially its poorest members, are to be met.
“Neither the government nor the private sector on their own are capable of managing our cities”, says Dr. Wally N'Dow, head of Habitat.

Films for Hygiene: Environment and Health
A project supported by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) in Bamako, Mali, has helped to improve living conditions in the city's old central quarters by building awareness of hygiene and health issues. Poor drainage, an accumulation of uncollected garbage, and a lack of potable water and sanitation facilities were among the consequences of runaway population growth in these neighbourhoods. These conditions resulted in a proliferation of flies and mosquitos and rampant malaria, diarrhoeal diseases and other illnesses, especially in the rainy season.
To ameliorate these conditions in the Medina Coura district, a Women's Cooperative for Education, Family Health and Sanitation was created with support from UNFPA and the United Nations Development for Women (UNIFEM). It involved secondary school graduates in organizing efforts to collect household garbage and clean up sewage ditches, combined with public education campaigns on health, family life and hygiene. Informal discussion groups and film showings aimed at women and adolescents focused on topics like the importance of sanitation, proper waste disposal, and protection and treatment of drinking water. They also pointed out the risks of too-early and too-closely spaced pregnancies, and provided information about family planning.
The outcome was an increased environmental awareness and changes in household behaviour, leading to improved living conditions. Residents proved willing to pay for garbage collection and cleanup efforts; these modest fees helped to sustain the project. The success of this project generated interest in creating similar services in other neighbourhoods. UNFPA is now supporting a similar project in the Sabalibougou quarter.

Garbage that’s not Garbage: Waste Disposal
The city of Curitiba, Brazil, does things differently. And, it seems, more successfully. When it was faced with a serious waste-management problem, it didn't do what other cities might have done. The conventional solution for such dilemmas is to go out and get a loan and then buy a $70 million recycling plant.
Curitiba decided to get its citizens involved. It mounted a campaign in schools and neighborhoods to encourage households to separate the waste: organic waste, which can be turned into compost, on one side and non-organic, but recyclable, garbage on another.
Then the city sent out a fleet of brightly-painted vans (left) to collect the "garbage that is not garbage" from all the neighborhoods. Working with an organization called the Institute for Social Integration, the city hired large numbers of previously unemployed people to separate the recyclable materials -- paper, metal, platic and glass -- a job which the $70 million recycling plant would have done at far greater cost, employing far fewer people.
The city of Curitiba saved millions of dollars. Hundreds of unemployed people became productive, salaried workers. The business community benefitted by providing the vans that collect the recyclable materials. Everyone pitched in and everyone gained.

Houses of Peace: Urban Violence and Safety
One of the unique challenges posed by urban development is urban violence. Without a sense of security no citizen will feel like he or she is part of a thriving, healthy community.
When Rodrigo Guerrero was elected mayor of Cali, Colombia, in 1992, the city was in the midst of a wave of violence in a country with one of the largest rates of murder in the world. He cited social disintegration as a chief reason for the large number of killings, which increased the general sense of insecurity and allowed for even more violence. He put in place "Public Safety Councils". These were not just some armed patrols, but councils that encouraged dialogue between local authorities and neighborhood leaders and dealt with the community's problems.
He also put in place the city's "houses of peace". These are centers that responded to complaints from citizens. In addition, he restricted the sale of alcohol and guns. Since then the homicide rate in Cali has dropped by 10 percent.

Flowers Among the Garbage:
Women and Community-Building
In the Mokattam Hills southeast of Cairo, 17,000 garbage collectors or "zabbaleen" live in dusty squatter settlements of teeming, narrow dirt lanes. There they sort and recycle the garbage produced by Cairo's burgeoning population.
Since donkey-pulled carts were banned from the city's modern section of Cairo, the zabbaleen have used pick-up trucks to collect garbage from residences. They sort, separate and recycle garbage for sale, under a programme sponsored by the Association for the Protection of the Environment. The health and well-being of the children of zabbaleen families, particularly girls, is a focus of the Association's activities.
At the Women's Centre in Mokattam, a bright modern building that stands out from its drab surroundings, a rag recycling programme targets the community's most disadvantaged girls, those who come from the poorest families, have not been to school and must help their families sort garbage.
Since 1988, 20 girls have been trained to weave discarded cotton scraps into rugs, using two-pedal hand looms. There is also training in patchwork quilt-making, and a new project to transform scrap paper into stationery, envelopes and embroidered folk art tableaux. After three months of training, the girls receive their own loom or sewing machine and continue to weave or sew from their homes. They are paid by the piece; the Association sells their products at expositions, hotels and a shop in the suburb of Heliopolis.
But this project is more than a cottage industry. By raising the status of young women, it has improved their quality of life and that of their families in unexpected and tangible ways. The programme provides literacy classes and drama presentations on the dangers of early marriage and child-bearing and the importance of preventive maternal and child health care. The result has been a radical reduction in family size among the women who entered the programme at age 11 or 12 and are now married. "Those who got married four or five years ago have only one child and most of the girls say they want only one or two," says a volunteer with the Association.
Some of the teenage weavers, such as Gehan Guirgis, 19, and Shayeda Atteya, 17, have also been trained to be primary health visitors. "We go to visit homes," Gehan explains, "talk about prenatal advice, tell children not to go barefoot in the garbage, give first aid, take children to be vaccinated, talk about family planning and escort women who want to go the clinic."
(Extracted and adapted from: The State of the World Population 1996, UNFPA)